| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Alienware Area-51m (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Alienware Alienware Area-51m |
| Memory | 57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181025 |
| Uptime | 0.4 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 11 '22 at 18:29 |
| Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
92.7%
Outstanding
|
92% 165 Pts
|
87% 720 Pts
|
86% 1,387 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080 (Mobile)
Dell(1028 08C4) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.98
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
118%
Outstanding
|
125% 158 fps
|
118% 148 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel Raid 0 Volume 237GB
220GB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 945 936 903 876 891 896 MB/s
|
267%
Outstanding
|
280% 1,260 MB/s
|
289% 85.7 MB/s
|
725% 974 MB/s
|
|
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
837GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 74 90 50 87 94 MB/s
|
43.4%
Average
|
58% 78.4 MB/s
|
203% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
79.8%
Very good
|
79% 27.8 GB/s
|
77% 26.9 GB/s
|
58% 68.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Area-51m Builds (Compare 543 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Alienware Area-51m
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i9-9900KIntel $403Bench 98%, 354,223 samples | 219x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $259Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 187x |
| Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 103x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2080 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 112%, 4,380 samples | 206x |
| GeForce RTX 2070NvidiaBench 89%, 5,557 samples | 95x |
| RTX 2070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 88%, 23,316 samples | 83x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 88% - Excellent | Total price: $403 |