Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Sempron 3850 APU R3 515 User benchmarks, average bench 30% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Memory 23 1-Core 18.1 2-Core 29.3 15% 23.5 Pts	4-Core 48.4 8-Core 52.3 7% 50.3 Pts	64-Core 57.2 4% 57.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 4 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 36B2) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1001.1001 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3.1 Parallax 2.2 1% 2.23 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 381GB free (System drive) Firmware: KC66 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 27.7 Write 36.5 Mixed 13 19% 25.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 88%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB 7,326 User benchmarks, average bench 8% 25GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 0.7 Write 0.5 Mixed 0.8 1% 0.67 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 1x4GB 2,381 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	11.4% Very poor	MC Read 4.9 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.07 GB/s	Latency 300 13% 300 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 11.4% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16