Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	6.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-1005G1 22,960 User benchmarks, average bench 44% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 21.8 1-Core 73.4 2-Core 157 42% 84.1 Pts	4-Core 227 8-Core 242 31% 234 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD G1 68,603 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 3FDC) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	6.08% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 6.5 Parallax 7.1 5% 6.7 fps	MRender 7.7 Gravity 7.2 Splatting 11.8 8% 8.9 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.08% Great: 7%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$64 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 327 283 297 297 338 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 364 Write 322 Mixed 268 SusWrite 307 71% 315 MB/s	4K Read 12.4 4K Write 26.3 4K Mixed 16.9 54% 18.5 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 236 194% 277 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT16G4SFS8266.C8FE Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 20GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 2667, 2667 MHz 16384, 4096 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	46.4% Average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 20.8 MC Mixed 15.4 52% 18 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 15.4 SC Mixed 9.8 29% 10.2 GB/s	Latency 308 13% 308 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD G1IntelBench 5%, 68,603 samples	940x
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	79x
GeForce MX330NvidiaBench 14%, 4,518 samples	63x

SSD
MZALQ256HAJD-000L2 256GBSamsungBench 113%, 9,692 samples	166x
PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 129%, 5,242 samples	85x
PC SN520 SDAPMUW-256G-1101 256GBWDCBench 143%, 6,320 samples	82x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBSamsungBench 65%, 2,729 samples	193x
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	100x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GBHynixBench 67%, 1,560 samples	99x