Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140923
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 18:06
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 303
38% 291 Pts
64-Core 300
19% 300 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185
PowerColor(148C 3000) 3GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1536 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 50.1
Reflection 25.9
Parallax 48.8
41% 41.6 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 39.7
Splatting 21.5
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 34%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
281GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1130A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 192 194 216 214 215 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.5% Average
Read 217
Write 204
Mixed 203
SusWrite 198
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 48
4K Mixed 17.8
78% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 23.7
DQ Write 83.2
DQ Mixed 21.5
26% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U79F9333G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
31.4% Below average
MC Read 10
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 9.1
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0 Builds (Compare 336 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LE/CSM R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback