HP ProBook 450 G3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (99th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 1 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.97% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8101
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170608
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 07 '17 at 15:25
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
61% Good
Memory 79.4
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 169
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 248
8-Core 250
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 245
15% 245 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 61%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 8101) 1GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.11.5
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
5.97% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 6.06
5% 7.2 fps
MRender 4.52
Gravity 6.13
Splatting 13.3
7% 8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.97%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500G 500GB
262GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 124%
TOSHIBA MQ01ACF050 500GB
452GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.8% Above average
Read 125
Write 125
Mixed 88.9
142% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.67
4K Write 2.07
4K Mixed 0.17
79% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
32.8% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 10.6
28% 9.97 GB/s
Latency 81.7
49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 450 G3 Builds (Compare 1,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback