Eluktronics MAX-17

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics86% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive53.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemEluktronics MAX-17  (all builds)
MotherboardEluktronics Standard
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 20:29
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 123
2-Core 227
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 316
8-Core 661
57% 488 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile)
Device(1D05 108B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
86% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 105
Parallax 110
85% 106 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 101
Splatting 92.5
88% 110 fps
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MANIX1000GB-G4SS 1TB
326GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 236 287 139 191 255 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Read 330
Write 1,938
Mixed 667
SusWrite 217
181% 788 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 2.2
88% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 45.3
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 94.3
67% 83.2 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 310%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$192
1TB free
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1079 1147 1373 1407 1299 1377 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 912
Write 366
Mixed 934
SusWrite 1,280
197% 873 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 64.3
206% 72.8 MB/s
DQ Read 936
DQ Write 729
DQ Mixed 573
499% 746 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 216%
Great: 282%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 23.7
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 22.2
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAX-17 Builds (Compare 226 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Eluktronics MAX-17

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback