Dell Studio XPS 8000

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 8000  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0X231R
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 05:55
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$339
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 86.6
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 121
60% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 180
8-Core 304
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 250
Asus(1043 7250) 2GB
Driver: 22.6.1
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
8.5% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 13.3
9% 12.4 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 9.4
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.5%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 199 198 212 219 212 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.5% Above average
Read 203
Write 212
Mixed 201
SusWrite 204
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 42.6
4K Mixed 31.2
100% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 47.1
39% 53.7 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 134%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
2GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 92.7
Write 115
Mixed 63.7
67% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.5
119% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
16GB free
Firmware: 0909
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
21% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 27.2
Mixed 23.8
SusWrite 18
23% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.8
179% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21%
Great: 103%
ASMT 2115 1TB
361GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 26.1
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 16.1
37% 31.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 7.2
353% 7.23 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 167%
Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250G 250GB
5GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 24 25 25 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 25.9
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 24.1
39% 31.7 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 7.2
333% 7.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
37.6% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 12.1
36% 12.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 11.5
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Studio XPS 8000 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 8000

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $388
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback