Apple MacPro6,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacPro6,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F60DEB81FF30ACF6
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 12 '22 at 00:27
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 188
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 646
58% 487 Pts
64-Core 900
56% 900 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro D700 (FireGL V)
Apple(106B 0127) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.7% Poor
Lighting 34.4
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 38.6
28% 32.3 fps
MRender 20.5
Gravity 32.5
Splatting 16.3
18% 23.1 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0512F 500GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UXM8JA1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1005
Write 752
Mixed 620
175% 792 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 36.9
124% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 254
206% 296 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31384A534631473732415A2D314739453220 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 42.9
MC Mixed 42.2
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 12.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 113%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacPro6,1 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Apple MacPro6,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback