Mainbrd OPS42A-SHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMainbrd OPS42A-SHA  (all builds)
MotherboardMAINBRD OPS42A-SHA
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220324
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '22 at 12:08
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8279U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 61
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 152
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 366
38% 306 Pts
64-Core 373
23% 373 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
6.35% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 9
Parallax 11.9
8% 10.3 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.13 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.35%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8P0S3128B-A0 128GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 102 114 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 350
Write 340
Mixed 323
SusWrite 138
65% 288 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 57.8
4K Mixed 30.7
114% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 189
166% 245 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 89%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
5GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 5.9 8.7 8.6 9.7 8.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 58
Write 14.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 8.2
20% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
53% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston SW32D4S2S8HDH-8 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.9% Very good
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 41.7
MC Mixed 12.2
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OPS42A-SHA Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Mainbrd OPS42A-SHA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback