HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87AE
Memory21 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210317
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 29 '22 at 08:08
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 45.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
66% 126 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 733
71% 584 Pts
64-Core 809
50% 809 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 87AE) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8935
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 59.7
Parallax 7.8
5% 24.5 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 7
Splatting 12.8
8% 8.7 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Netac NVMe SSD 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.S.F.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1702 1944 1825 1996 2045 2111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 772
Write 1,525
Mixed 1,068
SusWrite 1,937
303% 1,325 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 54.4
174% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 757
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 506
384% 530 MB/s
Poor: 186%
This bench: 228%
Great: 606%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 39GB
2400, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 12.4
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 4
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 5.2
17% 5.97 GB/s
Latency 179
22% 179 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx Builds (Compare 2,320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Laptop 16-a0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback