Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire M5910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire M5910  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M5910
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100611
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 04 '23 at 07:35
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SVN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 84.8
2-Core 139
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 343
38% 300 Pts
64-Core 350
22% 350 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
Sapphire(174B 1178) 1.5GB
CLim: 594 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.45% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 4.8
4% 5.83 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 5.6
5% 6.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
111GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 166 117 99 86 81 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.4% Average
Read 237
Write 226
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 127
36% 161 MB/s
4K Read 16.5
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 17.5
61% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 109
103% 161 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 80AD HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 0198 9905474-037.A01LF 0198 99U5474-023.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1600, 1600 MHz
2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 12
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 12.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M5910 Builds (Compare 184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M5910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $268
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback