Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 15 G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ZBook 15 G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8275
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220913
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateJan 06 '23 at 11:40
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
53.1% Above average
Memory 62.6
1-Core 67.5
2-Core 139
52% 89.6 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 340
36% 288 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2200
HP(103C 8277) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1377 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.69
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.1
Reflection 21.7
Parallax 21.8
17% 21.5 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 20.1
17% 20.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Pro 6000p NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$65
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 99 177 205 126 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 711
Write 469
Mixed 532
SusWrite 189
106% 475 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 27.8
99% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 317
236% 310 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
39.7% Below average
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 12.4
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 12.5
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 15 G4 Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback