QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory31.4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 31.4GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory27.8 GB free of 31.4375 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '23 at 05:53
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-10855M
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.7% Good
Memory 63.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 201
67% 122 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 614
61% 499 Pts
64-Core 603
37% 603 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 5000 with Max-Q Design
Legend(17AA 22B8) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 148
Parallax 134
98% 134 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 118
Splatting 122
110% 136 fps
Poor: 75%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 137GB
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,981
Write 2,318
Mixed 2,528
580% 2,609 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 43.6
150% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 522
DQ Write 410
DQ Mixed 474
352% 469 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 31GB
0, 0 MHz
16384, 15808 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
61.6% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 21.3
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 20.4
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 203%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback