Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	7.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	566% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D (all builds)
Memory	24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210618
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 16 '23 at 17:01
Run Duration	197 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-11900-$270 3,353 User benchmarks, average bench 100% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 81.7 1-Core 164 2-Core 329 102% 192 Pts	4-Core 659 8-Core 1,055 105% 857 Pts	64-Core 1,208 75% 1,208 Pts
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 750 15,464 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1273 Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	7.47% Terrible	Lighting 8.6 Reflection 14.2 Parallax 10.5 7% 11.1 fps	MRender 10.8 Gravity 11.3 Splatting 9 8% 10.4 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.47% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 900P Optane NVMe PCIe 280GB-$160 3,427 User benchmarks, average bench 440% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: E2010603 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1735 1744 1733 1743 1769 1770 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	566% Outstanding	Read 2,253 Write 1803 Mixed 2,143 SusWrite 1749 447% 1,987 MB/s	4K Read 292 4K Write 259 4K Mixed 273 930% 275 MB/s	DQ Read 2,033 DQ Write 1,614 DQ Mixed 1,777 1,342% 1,808 MB/s
Poor: 302% ↑ This bench: 566% Great: 559%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB 26,055 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 203GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 484 399 297 297 296 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 482 Mixed 417 SusWrite 376 100% 446 MB/s	4K Read 35.1 4K Write 93.8 4K Mixed 48.7 165% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 322 DQ Mixed 343 259% 348 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 126%
Seagate ST12000NE0008-2JL101 12TB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 45GB free Firmware: EN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 68 79 63 74 72 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Read 24.1 Write 42.8 Mixed 42.3 SusWrite 71.3 34% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 1.1 198% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 6TB (2017)-$87 14,331 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 31GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 16 16 17 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	8.15% Terrible	Read 10.4 Write 23.6 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 17.8 12% 15.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.2 55% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 8.15% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 43GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 28 26 28 26 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	9.97% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 24.7 Mixed 19.9 SusWrite 26.9 15% 19.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 46% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 9.97% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 16GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 75 75 67 81 75 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	23.2% Poor	Read 6.2 Write 28.2 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 72.9 30% 39.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.4 176% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 90%
WD Elements SE 25FF 4TB 1,938 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 25ff Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 78 80 78 79 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 36 Write 72.3 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 78.3 95% 64.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GB 17,500 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 26.9 MC Mixed 21.9 73% 25.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.3 SC Write 21.5 SC Mixed 18.8 57% 19.9 GB/s	Latency 77.4 52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 122%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z590 VISION D Builds (Compare 917 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 206%

UFO

Desktop 107%

UFO

Workstation 208%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z590 VISION D

CPU
Core i9-11900KIntel $265Bench 103%, 44,319 samples	191x
Core i7-11700KIntel $221Bench 101%, 65,651 samples	181x
Core i7-10700KIntel $230Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	89x

GPU
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	87x
RTX 3060Nvidia $255Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	85x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	82x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $108Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	86x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	58x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	55x

RAM
CMT32GX4M2C3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 91%, 17,500 samples	52x
CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 85%, 54,117 samples	25x
CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GBCorsairBench 94%, 38,830 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $1,033

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16