Today's hottest deals

Samsung 370E4K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 370E4K  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP370E4K-KW2BR
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160311
Uptime6 Days
Run DateJan 17 '23 at 15:50
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5200U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
38.1% Below average
Memory 56.9
1-Core 61.3
2-Core 39.4
37% 52.5 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 132
16% 121 Pts
64-Core 169
10% 169 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4549
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.4
Parallax 4.6
3% 3.3 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 3.9
3% 3.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Expansion 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 0707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 140 164 215 186 121 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
39.2% Below average
Read 307
Write 294
Mixed 256
SusWrite 185
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 23.5
4K Mixed 7.1
40% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 88.3
DQ Write 88.4
DQ Mixed 15.7
32% 64.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.2%
Great: 65%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 1TB
833GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2BA30002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 38 20 16 15 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 99
Mixed 38.6
SusWrite 33.1
44% 60.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF5641G8CJ8NWMNSEG 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.9
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 5.4
17% 6.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.9
12% 4.1 GB/s
Latency 137
29% 137 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 17.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 370E4K Builds (Compare 117 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 370E4K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback