QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3.95GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3.95GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.7 GB free of 3.95312 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 08:17
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7502P 32-Core Rome
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
1-Core 6.7
2-Core 11.1
4% 8.9 Pts
4-Core 5.2
8-Core 40.2
2% 22.7 Pts
64-Core 25.9
2% 25.9 Pts
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 268GB
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 103 121 114 102 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 196
Write 19.3
Mixed 65.2
SusWrite 111
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 88%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x3GB
1 of 1 slots used
3GB DIMM RAM
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.23% Terrible
MC Read 1
MC Write 1.1
MC Mixed 1.7
4% 1.27 GB/s
SC Read 0.3
SC Write 0.4
SC Mixed 0.3
1% 0.33 GB/s
Latency 1,352
3% 1,352 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 3.23%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO

System: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Good Total price: $485
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback