User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	empty empty
Motherboard	TYAN S5396
Memory	52.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090202
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '17 at 20:27
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450 569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% LGA771, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Memory 61.9 1-Core 42.4 2-Core 85.6 40% 63.3 Pts	4-Core 171 8-Core 333 30% 252 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K6000-$4,000 1,173 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 385.90 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	45.9% Average	Lighting 59.6 Reflection 54.2 Parallax 78.7 49% 64.2 fps	MRender 65.9 Gravity 46.9 Splatting 41.1 41% 51.3 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107 47,617 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1TB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 253 253 8525 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 850 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2614 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 626 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 60 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 789 (C2) HDA temperature 123 110 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	72.7% Very good	Read 135 Write 118 Mixed 88.2 85% 114 MB/s	4K Read 1.19 4K Write 2.54 4K Mixed 0.39 140% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 321GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 99 37081258 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7693 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 4307510742 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 12551 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5313 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 4295098373 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 51 487718941 (C2) HDA temperature 29 49 64424509469 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 32 21 37081258 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -48760763685786 (F1) Unknown 100 253 319071427 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2820679676	53.2% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 88.5 Mixed 24.1 51% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.85 4K Write 1.56 4K Mixed 0.51 121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 68%
Seagate ST3600057SS 600GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 244GB free (System drive) Firmware: 000B Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Read 147 Write 147 Mixed 144 110% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.45 4K Write 2.92 4K Mixed 0.67 189% 1.68 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 112%
Seagate ST3600057SS 600GB 320 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 304GB free Firmware: 000B Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	92.8% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 159 Mixed 153 119% 159 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 3.24 4K Mixed 1.14 239% 1.88 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 92.8% Great: 112%
Seagate Cheetah 15K.7 SAS 300GB-$72 1,032 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 153GB free Firmware: 000B Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 193 Mixed 179 141% 187 MB/s	4K Read 1.16 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.83 200% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 111%
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 96GB free Firmware: 00.02C01 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 155 4991 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17332 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24757 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10438 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 324 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17332 (C2) HDA temperature 114 99 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 355 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	32.7% Below average	Read 61.6 Write 51.8 Mixed 29.5 35% 47.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.99 4K Mixed 0.31 95% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 46%
WD WD3200AAJB-00J3A0 320GB 1,313 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 58GB free Firmware: 00.02C01 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 160 154 4991 (04) Start/Stop count 83 83 17866 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24786 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10461 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 1033 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17867 (C2) HDA temperature 113 102 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 64 19876 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.1% Poor	Read 51.5 Write 49.3 Mixed 21.4 30% 40.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.42 115% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8x8GB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	19.1% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 5.8 MC Mixed 8.5 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.3 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 142%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)