Average Bench: 57.3% (49th of 597)

Based on 252 user benchmarks.  Device: 10DE 103A Model: NVIDIA Quadro K6000

Average average bench

The Nvidia Quadro K6000 averaged 42.7% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This isn't a great result which indicates that there are much faster alternatives on the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 164fps
Avg. NBody particle system (Galaxy) 164fps

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Nvidia Quadro K6000 is just 11.2%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Nvidia Quadro K6000 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 139fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 92.5fps
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 252 samples)
Min Avg Max
128 Lighting 164 184
126 Reflection 139 146
195 Parallax 226 250
57.7% 176 fps
Min Avg Max
128 MRender 134 139
139 Gravity 164 187
89 Splatting 92.5 95.8
57% 130 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
HP(103C 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 411.81
Lighting 166
Reflection 138
Parallax 248
60% 184 fps
MRender 134
Gravity 190
Splatting 89.3
61% 138 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 397.93
Lighting 167
Reflection 144
Parallax 231
59% 181 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 186
Splatting 95.5
62% 140 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 11.2GB, Driver: 416.16
Lighting 173
Reflection 142
Parallax 227
60% 181 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 186
Splatting 92.1
60% 136 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 11.2GB, Driver: 353.62
Lighting 157
Reflection 118
Parallax 185
52% 153 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 142
Splatting 93.3
53% 122 fps
Nvidia(10DE 1036) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 347.88
Lighting 112
Reflection 133
Parallax 221
47% 155 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 137
Splatting 89.7
51% 119 fps
252 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 12,072,433 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 252 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (Approx. $4000 @ launch in Aug '13)
Nvidia(10DE 1036) 62% 57% ± 6%
HP(103C 1036) 37% 58% ± 6%
EVGA(3842 2888) 0% 76% ± 0%
Asus(1043 84A9) 0% 75% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical Quadro K6000 Builds (Compare 1,214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 98%
Nuclear submarine

System: HP Z820 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 16% - Very poor Total price: $4,097

Popular Quadro K6000 systems:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchMark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
  • - Share your opinion by voting.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) November 2018 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Comments

The most powerful pro graphics on the planet...

Added 3 years ago.

Poor (edit your comment) Add link

5 months ago.

I like it, but it is not so much meant for gaming though. I did get about 50-60 fps on fallout 4 though


Excellent

4 months ago.

i tried to run doom4 and the speed was fanatastic


Disliked

18 months ago.

Comment 

It is the best graphics card out there in every aspect, except gaming... Well, it is not too bad in gaming actually, should be on par with GTX 780. Overall well balanced. Tried running this card at 100% workload for 72hrs and no problem. For consumer grade stuff, even GTX 970 will be dead in water after that prolong running :)—Feb '15


Your
opinion?
597 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $359Nvidia GTX 1070 $340Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $80
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $130Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $245Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $97
Intel Core i5-8600K $237AMD RX 480 $280Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $130SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $869SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $130SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback