Today's hottest deals

Samsung 955XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 955XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT955XED-KK51G
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220525
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 16:04
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
62.4% Good
Memory 51.3
1-Core 101
2-Core 209
64% 120 Pts
4-Core 393
8-Core 712
66% 552 Pts
64-Core 1,072
66% 1,072 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1C5) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 2.8
2% 2.87 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 3
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2256HCHQ-00B 256GB
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7EK2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1783 446 431 421 443 453 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 1,310
Write 1,711
Mixed 1,406
SusWrite 663
287% 1,272 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 94.4
4K Mixed 70.5
194% 66.8 MB/s
DQ Read 596
DQ Write 531
DQ Mixed 637
458% 588 MB/s
Poor: 180%
This bench: 180%
Great: 351%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
124% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 48.1
MC Mixed 48.5
143% 50.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.7
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 19.7
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 156
26% 156 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 124%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 955XED Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 955XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback