Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision Tower 7810

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7810
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7810  (all builds)
Memory47.3 GB free of 56 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170726
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 04:21
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 68
1-Core 86.1
2-Core 162
60% 105 Pts
4-Core 309
8-Core 622
55% 465 Pts
64-Core 1,466
91% 1,466 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD FirePro W5000 Graphics Adapter
Dell(1028 0B06) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.12.1
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 27.4
Parallax 21.8
14% 22 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 14.9
Splatting 20.2
16% 19.2 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
885GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 030fAA20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 389 379 386 368 373 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 347
Write 344
Mixed 311
SusWrite 383
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 24.8
87% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 147
113% 153 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 101%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$47
340GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7S0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 136 135 141 132 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 129
Write 145
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 138
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2K43BB1-CRC M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A2K43BB1-CRC Hynix HMA81GR7AFR8N-UH 56GB
2400, 2133, 2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.8% Good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 22.3
71% 25 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.8
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7810 Builds (Compare 1,821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7810

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $53
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback