Acer Aspire A315-42

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-42  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Sleepy_PK
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201116
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 07:01
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Memory 18.2
1-Core 45.1
2-Core 74.5
25% 45.9 Pts
4-Core 88.3
8-Core 89.9
12% 89.1 Pts
64-Core 87.5
5% 87.5 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 6 Graphics
Acer(1025 134D) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.43% Terrible
Lighting 2.5
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 4.4
2% 4.47 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 2.43%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP6512G 512GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 473 271 321 570 450 230 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 662
Write 834
Mixed 774
SusWrite 386
150% 664 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 34.9
4K Mixed 26.5
85% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 101
84% 124 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 270%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
477GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 88 88 90 88 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.6% Average
Read 79.6
Write 84.2
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 85.1
55% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
153% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D4R4GS24A16R Micron 4ATF51264HZ-3G2J1 8GB
2400, 3200 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 10.3
25% 8.77 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 0.5
13% 4.6 GB/s
Latency 334
12% 334 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-42 Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-42

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback