Today's hottest deals

Asrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.74% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230214
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 14:48
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-12100-$111
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 22.1
1-Core 170
2-Core 335
84% 176 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 806
94% 731 Pts
64-Core 811
50% 811 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 730
ASRock(1849 4692) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1002
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
5.74% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 12.6
Parallax 7.8
5% 9 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 8.7
Splatting 5.2
6% 8.27 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.74%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP EX900 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$27
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U1123B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1052 1152 1156 1170 1147 849 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,583
Write 1,109
Mixed 963
SusWrite 1,088
265% 1,186 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 30.1
192% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 807
DQ Mixed 372
349% 526 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 212%
Great: 228%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.5% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 8.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 6.1
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 306
13% 306 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock H610M-HVS/M.2 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback