Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Laptop 14-ce3xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Laptop 14-ce3xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86E1
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220428
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 20:01
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.3% Below average
Memory 61
1-Core 4
2-Core 15.2
23% 26.7 Pts
4-Core 12.9
8-Core 17.3
2% 15.1 Pts
64-Core 24.7
2% 24.7 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
HP(103C 86E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.04% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.2
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.17 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 1.04%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 27 28 34 67 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Read 38.8
Write 124
Mixed 449
SusWrite 50.9
38% 166 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 20
4K Mixed 20.8
82% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 85.3
70% 100 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 94%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
19.9% Very poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 7
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 0.6
9% 3.07 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Laptop 14-ce3xxx Builds (Compare 646 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Laptop 14-ce3xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback