Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive329% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
SystemRazer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer PI411
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210607
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 03:57
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
Memory 81.7
1-Core 150
2-Core 313
97% 181 Pts
4-Core 594
8-Core 956
95% 775 Pts
64-Core 1,400
87% 1,400 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Device(1A58 2014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3200 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 153
Reflection 170
Parallax 147
125% 157 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 120
Splatting 111
108% 135 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 115%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2287 2212 1515 1513 1494 1527 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
329% Outstanding
Read 2,402
Write 2,335
Mixed 1,860
SusWrite 1,758
470% 2,089 MB/s
4K Read 58.3
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 77.9
258% 89.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,126
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,004
756% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 329%
Great: 329%
Realtek RTL9210 NVME 1TB
51GB free
Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 593 688 687 487 125 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 646
Write 633
Mixed 490
SusWrite 449
125% 554 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 74.6
4K Mixed 36.4
125% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 314
226% 291 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
70.7% Very good
MC Read 22.8
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 25.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 26
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 29.4
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 14 - RZ09-0370 Builds (Compare 469 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Razer Blade 14 - RZ09-0370

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback