Digicor Super Server

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (100th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 0 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory512GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 512GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemDigicor Super Server  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X12DAi-N6
Memory497.7 GB free of 512 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 04:52
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6330
CPU1, 2 CPU, 56 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72.3% Very good
Memory 78.6
1-Core 93.8
2-Core 177
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 702
62% 528 Pts
64-Core 4,670
289% 4,670 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A4500
Nvidia(10DE 163C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 20GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 212
Parallax 227
177% 219 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 176
Splatting 170
164% 206 fps
Poor: 133%
This bench: 158%
Great: 155%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SEDC1000BM8960G 960GB
813GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECEK22.5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,054
Write 885
Mixed 636
190% 858 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 49.8
202% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 683
DQ Write 760
DQ Mixed 678
522% 707 MB/s
Poor: 148% Great: 206%
Seagate One Touch w/PW 1TB
45GB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.3
Write 94.1
Mixed 80.7
61% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 69%
WD Elements SE 2622 1TB
61GB free, PID 2622
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 75.6
Write 75.8
Mixed 56.3
88% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
162% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965694-026.B00G 16x31.9GB
16 of 16 slots used
511GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
242% Outstanding
MC Read 102
MC Write 105
MC Mixed 100
292% 102 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 24.7
SC Mixed 11
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 242%
This bench: 242%
Great: 360%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback