Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite L300

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 17%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite L300  (all builds)
MotherboardTOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory1.1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '17 at 18:06
Run Duration337 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Dual T3400-$70
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 43.5
1-Core 20.7
2-Core 41.8
24% 35.3 Pts
4-Core 44.5
8-Core 39.4
6% 42 Pts
64-Core 44.1
3% 44.1 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Famille de jeu de puces Express Mobile Intel 45
Toshiba(1179 FF67) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.1749
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
0.23% Terrible
Lighting 0.33
Reflection 0.31
Parallax 0.34
0% 0.33 fps
MRender 0.19
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.13
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.23%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1652GSX 160GB-$30
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LV010A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.7% Poor
Read 46.8
Write 46.4
Mixed 36.8
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 0.38
4K Mixed 0.19
43% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 34%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
7GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Read 31
Write 4.6
Mixed 8.45
14% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.94
4K Write 0.11
4K Mixed 0.007
15% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
2048, 1024 MB
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
9.41% Terrible
MC Read 3.5
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.93 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 187
21% 187 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.41%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite L300 Builds (Compare 57 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite L300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback