Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsus WS C422 PRO_SE  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210322
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 24 '23 at 13:08
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2223
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 74.1
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 206
70% 126 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 591
60% 484 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6400
Gigabyte(1458 2404) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.3.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32.5% Below average
Lighting 33.9
Reflection 61.9
Parallax 77.4
28% 57.7 fps
MRender 93.5
Gravity 45.6
Splatting 27.2
42% 55.4 fps
Poor: 34%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 39%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot P210 512GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 230
SusWrite @10s intervals: 339 390 397 430 391 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 426
Write 196
Mixed 378
SusWrite 339
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 43.8
169% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 269
200% 262 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 101%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965742-063.B00G 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.8% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 8.8
32% 11 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 9.7
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS C422 PRO_SE Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus WS C422 PRO_SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 136% - Outstanding Total price: $105
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback