Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Toshiba Satellite C40D-A (all builds)
Motherboard	AMD Larne
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 08 '23 at 02:56
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	89%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-5000 APU 10,330 User benchmarks, average bench 27% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Memory 21.8 1-Core 10.8 2-Core 23.7 12% 18.8 Pts	4-Core 38.4 8-Core 40.6 5% 39.5 Pts	64-Core 35.1 2% 35.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8330 8,573 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 FA56) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1101.0 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	2.78% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 3.3 Parallax 2.4 3% 3.2 fps	MRender 2.2 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.78% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40 42,694 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 60 69 65 64 62 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	26.8% Poor	Read 29.3 Write 85.3 Mixed 22.2 SusWrite 63.9 36% 50.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.3 64% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 12GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.2 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3.6 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3 GB/s	Latency 308 13% 308 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
240G 240GBBRBench 78%, 141 samples	1x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	3x
HMT451S6AFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 19,285 samples	2x
4KTF25664HZ-1G6E1 1x2GBMicronBench 17%, 1,163 samples	2x