Lenovo INVALID

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 113%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 127%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive417% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemLenovo INVALID  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 332C
Memory121.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 11 '23 at 07:48
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600-$245
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 72.3
1-Core 209
2-Core 412
118% 231 Pts
4-Core 790
8-Core 1,344
130% 1,067 Pts
64-Core 2,182
135% 2,182 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 110%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$270
Legend(17AA 2088) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.05
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Lighting 136
Reflection 121
Parallax 141
110% 132 fps
MRender 144
Gravity 104
Splatting 88.9
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL22T0HDLB-00BLL 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2L2QGXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2530 2246 2178 2141 2162 2133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
417% Outstanding
Read 2,773
Write 3121
Mixed 2,682
SusWrite 2,232
610% 2,702 MB/s
4K Read 69.3
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 105
343% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,578
DQ Write 1,264
DQ Mixed 1,420
1,063% 1,421 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 417%
Great: 417%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB
400GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 39 40 40 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.3% Poor
Read 51.5
Write 36.6
Mixed 31
SusWrite 39.6
29% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.7
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A4G43BB2-CWE 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 35.8
108% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 44.2
SC Mixed 34.6
98% 34.4 GB/s
Latency 96.1
42% 96.1 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical INVALID Builds (Compare 2,511 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo INVALID

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback