Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Toshiba SATELLITE C870-1GN (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel PLCSF8
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121024
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 14 '23 at 15:59
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2430M-$53 41,461 User benchmarks, average bench 50% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 11.3 2-Core 26.4 8% 18.9 Pts	4-Core 57.7 8-Core 77 9% 67.3 Pts	64-Core 71.9 4% 71.9 Pts
Poor: 30% Great: 59%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB 97,462 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 440GB free (System drive) Firmware: 411030WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 126 111 121 120 120 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.3% Poor	Read 104 Write 119 Mixed 96.9 SusWrite 124 25% 111 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 5.5 20% 7.03 MB/s	DQ Read 156 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 120 97% 137 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT4G3S1067M.C16FKD 2x4GB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 7.7 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.57 GB/s	Latency 527 8% 527 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16