Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 40% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	51.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	79% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

12 months ago, 12 months ago.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201019
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 16 '23 at 23:45
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	52%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3 1,130 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	60% Above average	Memory 69.5 1-Core 78.4 2-Core 142 57% 96.8 Pts	4-Core 272 8-Core 488 46% 380 Pts	64-Core 1210 75% 1210 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% Zotac(19DA 2437) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (45^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	51.4% Above average	Lighting 62.6 Reflection 65.6 Parallax 60.1 51% 62.8 fps	MRender 65.6 Gravity 65.3 Splatting 61.6 52% 64.2 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon S960 256 256GB 125 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: V.01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 162 166 159 107 116 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	79% Very good	Read 462 Write 425 Mixed 376 SusWrite 164 80% 357 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 57.2 4K Mixed 34.4 112% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 364 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 253 216% 316 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 102%
Seagate ST2000NM0033 59Y5483 59Y5551IBMV 2TB 29 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 25GB free Firmware: BB5A SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 88 87 83 84 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 87.8 Write 87 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 85.6 64% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1K43BB0-CRC 4x8GB 274 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	90.8% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 38.3 MC Mixed 31.6 104% 36.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.1 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 11.7 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,235 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,243x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	958x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	410x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	416x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	386x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	287x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	108x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	105x
MX500 500GBCrucial $49Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	62x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	349x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	209x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	193x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16