Samsung 750XED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemSamsung 750XED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP750XED-KB3ES
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230213
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 02 '23 at 00:56
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.5% Average
Memory 43.3
1-Core 72.3
2-Core 123
45% 79.5 Pts
4-Core 203
8-Core 359
34% 281 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C1C6) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.7% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 10.1
3% 5.1 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 14.6
Splatting 11.2
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 1300 1352 664 332 217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 708
Write 1182
Mixed 668
SusWrite 830
192% 847 MB/s
4K Read 13.9
4K Write 24.1
4K Mixed 19.1
58% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 144
DQ Mixed 250
181% 238 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 108%
Great: 218%
WD PC SN740 SDDPTQD-1T00 1TB
680GB free
Firmware: 73110000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1216 1432 1497 1719 1823 1886 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
178% Outstanding
Read 1,168
Write 1,259
Mixed 820
SusWrite 1,595
274% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 17.8
64% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 436
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 402
278% 352 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 178%
Great: 541%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AB-MGCL 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 32.9
MC Mixed 40.8
93% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 188
21% 188 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 750XED Builds (Compare 492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 750XED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback