Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 850 G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP EliteBook 850 G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8079
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221215
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 14:22
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6600U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 77.8
2-Core 140
55% 94.1 Pts
4-Core 190
8-Core 192
26% 191 Pts
64-Core 126
8% 126 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro Graphics 580
HP(103C 8079) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4352
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
4.62% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 5.7
4% 4.5 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.6
5% 6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.62%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix SC311 SATA 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 70000P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 78 83 95 99 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 369
Write 249
Mixed 263
SusWrite 100
55% 245 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 41.8
4K Mixed 26.7
84% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 115
97% 142 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 82%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
23GB free
Firmware: GS2OA3C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 87 88 87 89 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
55.9% Above average
Read 107
Write 110
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 87.8
60% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston XF875V-MIH 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.4% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 5.9
22% 7.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 850 G3 Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 850 G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $299Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback