HC HCAR5000-MI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHC HCAR5000-MI  (all builds)
MotherboardHC HCAR5000-MI
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 12 '23 at 21:23
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5625U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
Memory 73.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 293
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 616
73% 563 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 19.3
Reflection 21.8
Parallax 24.4
16% 21.8 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 20.4
16% 18.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Airdisk 512GB SSD 512GB
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN10093
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1977 1952 1591 568 610 624 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 1,928
Write 2,327
Mixed 1,746
SusWrite 1,220
407% 1,805 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 137
4K Mixed 74.2
251% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 859
DQ Write 850
DQ Mixed 932
679% 880 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 268%
Great: 268%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ASint ASSD4320008G8b223 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
80% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26.4
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 37.3
SC Mixed 27.3
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 93.9
43% 93.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 80%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical HCAR5000-MI Builds (Compare 48 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HC HCAR5000-MI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback