Lenovo 20DE0007KR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20DE0007KR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20DE0007KR
Memory3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170918
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '17 at 01:50
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7300 APU (2014 M.Ka)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Memory 53.1
1-Core 31.8
2-Core 55.1
31% 46.7 Pts
4-Core 92.2
8-Core 92.6
12% 92.4 Pts
64-Core 87.2
5% 87.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R6 Graphics
Legend(17AA 130A) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 3.83
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 4.94
3% 4.74 fps
MRender 4.86
Gravity 3.37
Splatting 6.22
4% 4.81 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 512GB-$173
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N1114H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
65% Good
Read 478
Write 376
Mixed 427
95% 427 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 19
60% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 69.4
DQ Mixed 42.5
44% 73.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMT3170ME68F9F1600 Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.1% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 10.6
26% 9.17 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 6.1
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback