Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 247%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 283%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics241% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC  (all builds)
Memory49.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '23 at 22:36
Run Duration358 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$241
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 177
2-Core 330
108% 199 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,363
117% 1,003 Pts
64-Core 2,272
141% 2,272 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 105%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XT-$900
XFX(1EAE 7905) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 20GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
241% Outstanding
Lighting 311
Reflection 435
Parallax 638
253% 461 fps
MRender 448
Gravity 246
Splatting 459
320% 384 fps
Poor: 158%
This bench: 241%
Great: 249%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2030 1903 1885 1942 1939 1906 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,575
Write 2539
Mixed 2,420
SusWrite 1,934
533% 2,367 MB/s
4K Read 74.3
4K Write 172
4K Mixed 103
336% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1357
DQ Write 1,207
DQ Mixed 1,305
972% 1,289 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 383%
Great: 435%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
803GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1800 1796 1794 1799 1802 1801 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2,007
Mixed 2,067
SusWrite 1,799
470% 2,095 MB/s
4K Read 73.4
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 100
325% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,429
DQ Write 1,285
DQ Mixed 1,373
1,025% 1,362 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 372%
Great: 435%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$85
239GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 141 142 139 137 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 128
Write 94.7
Mixed 74.4
SusWrite 138
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 114%
WD Elements 2620 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 96 95 94 96 95 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 116
Write 106
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 94.9
129% 97.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
179% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 65%
WD Elements 10B8 3TB
583GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 100 95 88 84 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 98
Write 97.9
Mixed 93
SusWrite 91.6
130% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
82% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 49%
WD Elements 25A1 3TB
49GB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 69 85 93 95 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
33% Below average
Read 77.7
Write 66.2
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 86
98% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33%
Great: 62%
WD Elements 2TB
459GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 95 90 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
37.4% Below average
Read 81.3
Write 82.6
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 88.6
103% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 44%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
121GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 80 81 82 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 92.4
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 79.9
108% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 61%
WD Elements 25A2 5TB
2TB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 30 25 24 22 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 38.2
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 26.8
44% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 60.4
MC Write 42.1
MC Mixed 43.7
139% 48.7 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 26.7
SC Mixed 40.4
93% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 130%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC Builds (Compare 3,567 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B550 AORUS PRO AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $773
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback