Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	40.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	20.5% Poor	Memory 30.5 1-Core 17.5 2-Core 32.9 18% 27 Pts	4-Core 60.7 8-Core 67.1 8% 63.9 Pts	64-Core 63.7 4% 63.7 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.5% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 3637) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 2.1 1% 1.23 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.1 2% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T253X6256G 256GB 941 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 192GB free (System drive) Firmware: HCS1A25E SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 144 110 56 67 63 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	40.1% Average	Read 360 Write 334 Mixed 306 SusWrite 119 63% 280 MB/s	4K Read 16 4K Write 20.9 4K Mixed 9.1 47% 15.3 MB/s	DQ Read 108 DQ Write 99.1 DQ Mixed 17.7 37% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
RAMAXEL RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GB 10,170 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 3.6 12% 4.3 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 3 8% 2.7 GB/s	Latency 252 16% 252 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	1x

SSD
T253X6256G 256GBTeamBench 70%, 941 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3170MN68F9F1600 1x4GBRAMAXELBench 25%, 10,170 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16