Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 22% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	18.4% Very poor	Memory 26.3 1-Core 37.8 2-Core 52.9 23% 39 Pts	4-Core 60.7 8-Core 68.1 8% 64.4 Pts	64-Core 62.4 4% 62.4 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 9840) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.78% Terrible	Lighting 0.8 Reflection 1.1 Parallax 0.7 1% 0.87 fps	MRender 0.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 2 1% 1.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.78% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 240GB SSD 240GB 2,181 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: SN07656 SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 23 24 24 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33% Below average	Read 605 Write 28 Mixed 23 SusWrite 25 36% 170 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 2 26% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMSO440D85-2666E 1x4GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.42% Terrible	MC Read 1.3 MC Write 4.6 MC Mixed 1.4 7% 2.43 GB/s	SC Read 0.9 SC Write 2.5 SC Mixed 2 5% 1.8 GB/s	Latency 277 14% 277 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.42% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	44x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	44x

SSD
240GB SSD 240GBLexarBench 61%, 2,181 samples	12x
Forza NSN095SA356-Y01Q2I0 256GBNeoBench 69%, 22 samples	11x
S3SSDA256-ECS-1 256GBBench 63%, 8 samples	8x

RAM
NMSO440D85-2666E 1x4GBUnknownBench 22%, 67 samples	19x
WAR4S2666D19041C 1x4GBUnknownBench 14%, 10 samples	8x
LD4AS004G-H2666GSC 1x4GBUnknownBench 14%, 10 samples	6x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16