Today's hottest deals

Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111214
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '17 at 21:36
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2350M
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 60.1
2-Core 94.1
52% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 142
8-Core 153
20% 148 Pts
64-Core 156
10% 156 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C606) 786MB
Driver: igdumd32.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.17
Reflection 3.27
Parallax 1.44
2% 2.29 fps
MRender 2.95
Gravity 1.17
Splatting 4
2% 2.71 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS725032A9A365 320GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PC3OCD0H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 92.3
Write 99.5
Mixed 97
73% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 1.13
4K Mixed 0.32
80% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 55%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT112S6BFR6C-G7 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 14.8
MC Write 15.2
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E4Z/300E5Z/300E7Z

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback