Lenovo 81S9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive27.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (63%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81S9  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190704
Uptime9.1 Days
Run DateJun 15 '23 at 20:41
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 63%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Memory 48.1
1-Core 21.6
2-Core 44.1
26% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 83.4
8-Core 132
13% 108 Pts
64-Core 191
12% 191 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 71%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFK0S.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 221 232 155 214 183 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 220
Write 300
Mixed 194
SusWrite 209
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 5.4
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 6
20% 6.17 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 323%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
927GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 57 53 42 49 50 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
44% Average
Read 102
Write 60.7
Mixed 54.6
SusWrite 50.6
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
131% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 44%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD Kingston 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
33.8% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 4.3
14% 5 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81S9 Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81S9

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback