Intel JSL MRD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics4.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Jasper Lake Client Platform
MotherboardIntel JSL MRD  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221025
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 15 '23 at 10:45
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Memory 21.9
1-Core 70
2-Core 137
39% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 197
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.15% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 4.6
4% 5.13 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 4.4
Splatting 7
5% 5.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FPT310M4SSD256G 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HAFEB2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 81 40 25 29 38 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.4% Poor
Read 283
Write 126
Mixed 152
SusWrite 38.6
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 16.9
4K Mixed 4.4
34% 11.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 8.6
DQ Mixed 13
24% 51.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 6.8
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 307
13% 307 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical JSL MRD Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel JSL MRD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback