Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive451% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221013
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 12:03
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 197
2-Core 392
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 766
8-Core 1,380
129% 1,073 Pts
64-Core 2,235
138% 2,235 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 109%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$450
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
146% Outstanding
Lighting 213
Reflection 205
Parallax 192
174% 203 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 149
Splatting 132
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 146%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
803GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2748 2942 3077 2976 1620 1617 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
451% Outstanding
Read 2,938
Write 3,233
Mixed 3,023
SusWrite 2,496
660% 2,923 MB/s
4K Read 84.5
4K Write 203
4K Mixed 116
384% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,562
DQ Write 1,221
DQ Mixed 1,397
1,044% 1,393 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 451%
Great: 477%
Intel SSDSC2KB960GZ 960GB
632GB free
Firmware: 7CV10100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 429 436 440 442 439 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
93% Outstanding
Read 457
Write 429
Mixed 322
SusWrite 436
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 70
4K Mixed 33.6
115% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 255
198% 269 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 93%
Great: 93%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$85
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 150 150 150 151 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 146
Write 136
Mixed 99.9
SusWrite 150
98% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
118% Outstanding
MC Read 47.3
MC Write 45.2
MC Mixed 40.5
127% 44.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 44.6
SC Mixed 28.8
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 118%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 36: 0P 4R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
36% 20% 71 543 456 60 27" 1920 1080 ACI27C4 VC279
History: Score 19: 0P 2R 2G 3B | Score 36: 0P 4R 3G 7B
Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4 Builds (Compare 4,065 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS WIFI D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $467
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback