Asus AM1M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus AM1M-A  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141125
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 16 '17 at 14:41
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 56%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5350 APU R3
FS1b , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.05 GHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
38.2% Below average
Memory 58.5
1-Core 31.5
2-Core 62.7
34% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 104
8-Core 112
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 119
7% 119 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8400-R3
Asus(1043 8623) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.351.1001.0
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
1.96% Terrible
Lighting 2.13
Reflection 4.65
Parallax 2.69
2% 3.16 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 2.03
Splatting 3.43
2% 2.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.96%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 040H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 463
Write 249
Mixed 340
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 5.49
37% 9.68 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 74%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$176
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 106
Write 94
Mixed 94.9
74% 98.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 2.05
4K Mixed 0.21
92% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905595-010.A00LF 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
18.7% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 6.7
15% 5.1 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1M-A Builds (Compare 64 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus AM1M-A - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $335
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback