Today's hottest deals

Apple iMacPro1,1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemApple iMacPro1,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-7BA5B2D9E42DDD94
Memory56.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 05 '23 at 02:43
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-2150B
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 73.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 224
76% 138 Pts
4-Core 427
8-Core 758
71% 592 Pts
64-Core 1,268
78% 1,268 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X
Apple(106B 0188) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1468 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 19.30.01.53
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.6% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 38.6
Parallax 88.8
77% 74.1 fps
MRender 73.9
Gravity 100
Splatting 63.8
64% 79.2 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 90%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP1024 1TB
349GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1290
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1591 691 1537 1677 1623 1686 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GR7AFR4N-VK 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 46.5
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 38.9
126% 43.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 18.4
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 93.7
43% 93.7 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 17.7" 1280 720 APPAE1E iMac
Typical iMacPro1,1 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Apple iMacPro1,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 142% - Outstanding Total price: $167
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback