Acer Nitro AN515-58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (2nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 98 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive266% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 months ago.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-58  (all builds)
MotherboardADL Jimny_ADH
Memory3.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220701
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateAug 09 '23 at 07:37
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 46.6
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 200
60% 114 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 426
54% 410 Pts
64-Core 762
47% 762 Pts
Poor: 95%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Acer(1025 159C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3302
Relative performance (0th percentile)
4.94% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 57
Parallax 6.2
5% 22.9 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7.6
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.94%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL21T0HCLR-00BT7 1TB
685GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXA7402Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1992 2493 2274 1736 1648 1686 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
266% Outstanding
Read 1,992
Write 2,018
Mixed 1,876
SusWrite 1,971
443% 1,965 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 68.3
4K Mixed 52.7
170% 55 MB/s
DQ Read 321
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 243
190% 264 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 266%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG66MEBSA092N 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 27.5
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 14.6
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 174
23% 174 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 44 165 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0ABF
Typical Nitro AN515-58 Builds (Compare 4,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: Acer Nitro AN515-58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback