Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 32% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Intel Jasper Lake Client Platform
Motherboard	Intel JSL MRD (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221115
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 17 '23 at 21:41
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5105 1,007 User benchmarks, average bench 37% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	30% Below average	Memory 19.4 1-Core 72.4 2-Core 131 38% 74.2 Pts	4-Core 232 8-Core 242 31% 237 Pts	64-Core 247 15% 247 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 2,226 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.1999 Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	1.91% Terrible	Lighting 2.6 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.73 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 1 2% 2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.91% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NS512GSSD340 512GB 201 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 430GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0823A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 236 235 168 189 321 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Read 355 Write 177 Mixed 310 SusWrite 248 61% 272 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 31.6 4K Mixed 13.6 64% 21.6 MB/s	DQ Read 207 DQ Write 204 DQ Mixed 41.3 76% 151 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 96%
Fikwot FS810 2TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: SN14130 SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 240 322 302 346 356 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	59.9% Above average	Read 332 Write 311 Mixed 314 SusWrite 318 72% 319 MB/s	4K Read 12 4K Write 28.3 4K Mixed 18.8 57% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 213 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 207 155% 206 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 108%
WD Game Drive 1TB 212 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 639GB free Firmware: 3083 SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 311 452 213 213 220 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	53.7% Above average	Read 402 Write 432 Mixed 362 SusWrite 310 85% 377 MB/s	4K Read 15.1 4K Write 17 4K Mixed 11.8 47% 14.6 MB/s	DQ Read 28.4 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 173 112% 124 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GB 512 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20% Poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 9.4 MC Mixed 6.3 21% 7.3 GB/s	SC Read 4.3 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 325 12% 325 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 20% Great: 41%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	25	9	60	27"	1920 1080	SAM0D32 C27F390

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5105IntelBench 37%, 1,007 samples	400x
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	87x
Celeron N5100IntelBench 34%, 996 samples	23x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 2,226 samples	423x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	101x

RAM
53D512M64D4RQ-046 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 89 samples	90x
2x6GBSamsungBench 41%, 80 samples	78x
KINSOTIN16GB2666MHZ 1x16GBUnknownBench 33%, 512 samples	70x