Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory15 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221023
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateAug 21 '23 at 22:55
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$280
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 73.1
1-Core 212
2-Core 426
121% 237 Pts
4-Core 772
8-Core 1,354
128% 1,063 Pts
64-Core 1,868
116% 1,868 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 109%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
AMD(1002 164E) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.7.2
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
7.7% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 12.9
6% 11 fps
MRender 12.5
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 20.3
12% 13.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.7%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Pcie SSD 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.9 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 239 271 227 215 245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1217
Write 1057
Mixed 1,051
SusWrite 279
202% 901 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 70.3
252% 98.8 MB/s
DQ Read 763
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 287
280% 457 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 168%
Great: 214%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
49GB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4156
Write 4,084
Mixed 2,961
832% 3,734 MB/s
4K Read 70.8
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 90.3
355% 137 MB/s
DQ Read 2,270
DQ Write 1,966
DQ Mixed 1,941
1,503% 2,059 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 181 181 184 182 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 182
Write 62.3
Mixed 72.5
SusWrite 182
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 1.1
73% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 13.1
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 39%
Seagate Portable 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0712
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 110 111 116 111 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 80.4
Write 109
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 112
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5200Z40 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
134% Outstanding
MC Read 48.8
MC Write 48.3
MC Mixed 47.9
138% 48.3 GB/s
SC Read 42.3
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 43.7
129% 45.2 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 134%
This bench: 134%
Great: 180%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 0 31.5" 1280 720 TCL0000 40S355
Typical TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X670E-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,171
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback