Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive427% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '23 at 10:46
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600X-$200
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 78
1-Core 202
2-Core 388
116% 223 Pts
4-Core 691
8-Core 1,146
112% 918 Pts
64-Core 1,378
85% 1,378 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 104%
Great: 120%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$749
CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 536.99
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 208% Great: 256%
AMD Ryzen 7000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 8877) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.46
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 8% Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT2000P3PSSD8 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR40A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3880 1156 3989 4022 4024 1097 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
427% Outstanding
Read 2,096
Write 4010
Mixed 2,376
SusWrite 3,028
654% 2,878 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 224
4K Mixed 77.4
291% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,701
DQ Write 1,394
DQ Mixed 1,551
1,160% 1,549 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 427%
Great: 517%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B6000C30 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
150% Outstanding
MC Read 53.3
MC Write 54.3
MC Mixed 53.7
154% 53.8 GB/s
SC Read 50.3
SC Write 59
SC Mixed 51.6
153% 53.6 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 150%
This bench: 150%
Great: 258%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F32 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 277%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B650-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $1,462
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback