Average Bench: 256% (3rd of 692)

Based on 693 user benchmarks.  Device: 1002 744C Model: AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

AMD’s new 7900 series GPUs received a lot of pre-launch hype. There were claims of 50-70% performance improvements over the previous flagship. Our benchmarks show that the 7900-XTX leads the 6950-XT by around 30%. AMD overhype their product launches because it is effective at getting first-time buyers to pay over MRSP. After an initial burst in sales, prices often drop rapidly, as with the 6900 XT and the recently launched Zen 4 7950X, which are now both 30% cheaper. AMD’s domination of social media platforms has historically resulted in millions of users purchasing sub standard products, those users will be very hard, if not impossible for AMD to win back. If this trend continues, semiconductors may become a secondary business line for AMD, who appear more focused on developing “Advanced Marketing” relationships with select youtubers and media outlets. Based on the volume of social media/press coverage, you would never guess that the combined market share for all of AMD’s Radeon 5000 and 6000 GPUs amongst PC gamers is just 2.12% (Steam stats). Be wary of sponsored reviews (golden samples+cherry picked games) that showcase the wins and gloss over the losses whilst conveniently ignoring frame drops. Despite steady price cuts, an increasing number of seasoned gamers simply have no interest in buying AMD products. They know from bitter experience that headline average fps are worthless when they are accompanied with stutters, random crashes, excessive noise and a limited feature set. Most gamers, who are better off playing at 1080p, will do well to wait for Nvidia’s upcoming 4060/4070 series cards (est. early 2023). Even brand fans that wish to be in AMD’s “2%” club, will find better deals after the launch hype settles. Shoppers should avoid AMD’s reference design as many users are reporting thermal issues. [Dec '22 GPUPro]

Outstanding average bench

The AMD RX 7900-XTX averaged 156.0% higher than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the AMD RX 7900-XTX near the top of the comparison list.


Avg. Locally-deformable PRT (Bat) 333fps
Avg. Force Splatted Flocking (Swarm) 450fps

Average consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the AMD RX 7900-XTX is 40.1%. This is a relatively wide range which indicates that the AMD RX 7900-XTX performs inconsistently under varying real world conditions.


Avg. High dynamic range lighting (Teapot) 441fps
Avg. Parallax occlusion mapping (Stones) 706fps

Average Bench

(Based on 693 samples)
Min Avg Max
281 Lighting 333 367
377 Reflection 441 480
608 Parallax 706 780
271% 493 fps
Min Avg Max
449 MRender 498 534
259 Gravity 288 312
418 Splatting 450 483
340% 412 fps
User Benchmarks Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
The fastest GPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
AMD(1002 0E3B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.1.1
Lighting 310
Reflection 444
Parallax 699
252% 484 fps
MRender 468
Gravity 260
Splatting 431
319% 387 fps
PowerColor(148C 2422) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 22.12.1
Lighting 303
Reflection 421
Parallax 670
247% 465 fps
MRender 424
Gravity 271
Splatting 446
317% 381 fps
XFX(1EAE 7901) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.1.1
Lighting 302
Reflection 405
Parallax 628
246% 445 fps
MRender 466
Gravity 273
Splatting 397
310% 379 fps
AMD(1002 0E3B) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.1.1
Lighting 293
Reflection 402
Parallax 600
238% 431 fps
MRender 473
Gravity 273
Splatting 431
323% 392 fps
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.1.1
Lighting 270
Reflection 372
Parallax 561
220% 401 fps
MRender 431
Gravity 240
Splatting 415
300% 362 fps
693 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 58,597,062 GPUs tested.

 Popular Cards

Based on statistics from 693 user benchmarks.

Hardware Id Samples Bench ± SD Model / Price (MSRP ≈ $1000 @ launch in Dec '22)
AMD(1002 0E3B) 34% 257% ± 14%
PowerColor(148C 2422) 20% 255% ± 10%
XFX(1EAE 7901) 17% 255% ± 14%
Sapphire(1DA2 E471) 14% 253% ± 11%
Gigabyte(1458 240E) 5% 257% ± 10%
Sapphire(1DA2 471E) 3% 259% ± 5%
ASRock(1849 5304) 3% 263% ± 7%
Gigabyte(1458 240D) 2% 257% ± 8%
PwrHis(1787 2422) 1% 262% ± 0%
ASRock(1849 5302) 1% 264% ± 0%
Send price feedback
Typical RX 7900-XTX Builds (Compare 20,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 214%
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 216%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,549

Popular RX 7900-XTX compatible motherboards:

How Fast Is Your GPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute.

Welcome to our freeware PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark.
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string.
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations.
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO.
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency.
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy.
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com.
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC.
  • - See speed test results from other users.
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders.
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build.
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware.
Graphics Card Rankings (Price vs Performance) February 2023 GPU Rankings.

We calculate effective 3D speed which estimates gaming performance for the top 12 games. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield value for money. Our figures are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top GPUs. [GPUPro]


Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.


Built on the groundbreaking AMD RDNA 3 architecture with chiplet technology...

Added 1 month ago.

Excellent (edit your comment) Add link

1 day ago.


Spot on review as usual - good job—Dec '22


2 days ago.


Good framerates but extremely stuttery. drivers are still terrible and the product is by far unfinished.—Dec '22


15 days ago.


frequent RMAs. Had to give 3 stars only—Jan '23


1 month ago.


27 days ago.

For AU$1200 less than a RTX4090 it's my first card from AMD. RT I don't care about, it's like VR or 3D cinema, a novelty. It's nice, until you realise it renders with upscaling to 4k to make the fps worth it. So essentially, you're running the game at 1440P/1080P/720P with sharpening. And this is how GPU's are tested now. It's like asking the CPU to do half the work and then giving it a better score.


27 days ago.

Way too overpriced for just raster performance

692 Graphics Cards (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list.

See how consistently different GPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

 Best User Rated

The Best.
Intel Core i5-13600K $302Nvidia RTX 3060 $325Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i3-12100F $98Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $450Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $106
Intel Core i5-12400F $160Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti $850Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $50SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $49SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $417SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback