Today's hottest deals

Atopnuc MA90

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 16%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAtopnuc MA90  (all builds)
MotherboardATOPNUC ATOPNUC MA90
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 14 '23 at 17:16
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9400 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Memory 21.6
1-Core 14.5
2-Core 19.9
13% 18.7 Pts
4-Core 31
8-Core 37.5
4% 34.2 Pts
64-Core 37.9
2% 37.9 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 40%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Device(1E50 8014) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.7 fps
MRender 2.4
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 3.4
2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SCY SNM4BBG12800D 128GB
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H210909a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 197 220 216 220 212 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.5% Below average
Read 201
Write 186
Mixed 172
SusWrite 208
43% 192 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 9.3
31% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 80.7
DQ Write 65.4
DQ Mixed 83.3
60% 76.5 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown WPBH26D408SWA-8G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.54% Terrible
MC Read 2.8
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.6
8% 2.73 GB/s
SC Read 0.6
SC Write 1.3
SC Mixed 0.7
2% 0.87 GB/s
Latency 309
13% 309 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.54%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 41 19 60 7.2" 1920 1017 SAM064E SMB2430H
Typical MA90 Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Atopnuc MA90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback